Bigness

There was once a religious cult, (or maybe it was a political party, I forget which), whose beliefs no one could ascertain, but whose followers were passionate, vocal and visible in a manner most striking.  It was said simply that theirs was a “great belief,” but what else IS such a group?

The only info useful to the Real Revolutionist is “privileged” information.  All other data is just smoke and noise.

What do you think Life may be up to again, in getting Man to seriously “question” the human concept of “bigness”?  Mortal enterprises are driven to a sloganeer, “Being biggest hasn’t made us better; being better has made us biggest,” and other similar comments which seem to turn a distrustful focus on the whole picture of human engineered “bigness”?  I ask you, “What might be up?”  On the basis that Life has specific, observable need and appreciation for bigness, in that

it translates most often into–POWER, which is the creative energy for both Man and Life.

I could say to you, and for you, that Man’s 3-D notions of good-and-evil are like lesser reflections of an earlier 4-D division-of-labor.

Do you find it interesting that within the areas of Man’s “creative arts,” he apparently intends to use his negative opinions as a kind of denial-of-existence?  He will dogmatically proclaim, “I do not like that painting,” and this is stated in such a manner as to leave no doubt that the speaker is, in fact, denying that the piece in question is even art at all.  Now THAT’S some strong opinion.

J.